After years of negotiations on its nuclear program, one thing is now clear: the Iranian regime is not willing to give up its nuclear program. His interest goes back years, does not respond to bravado cyclical or a strategic necessity. Statements by the Iranian regime accountable leaves no doubt: they do not want any treatment and feel that their right to nuclear program is non-negotiable. This is the message I have for years been sending to the international community.
Currently, the Iranians are having some technical difficulties with the centrifuges, which are functioning below what is necessary to achieve the degree of enrichment for military use. International sanctions are hindering the program, but not paralyzed. However, it is indisputable that Iran is inching toward its goal. The most pessimistic estimates speak of two years and the most optimistic of ten.
need start thinking about what to do about a possibility that is growing. Regional and global implications of a nuclear Iran especially with a regime like that of the ayatollahs, make that scenario is totally unacceptable, drawing each one worse scenarios.
In the best case scenario, Iran would use the pump only as a deterrence against its enemies or rivals in the West or in any other area. If so, would push their Sunni neighbors to seek a strategic balance, rearming. Enemies, adversaries and rivals, would endow themselves with nuclear weapons. Even if it used the weapon to either "classic", a nuclear Iran to fuel nuclear proliferation in the area, with multiple and unstable actors. Actors
multiple and unstable, each one with a limited nuclear arsenal, which derive nuclear strategy of nuclear deterrence strategy of the first and only hit. Thus, the risk of humanity becomes involved for the first time ever in a nuclear war would be high, and subject to strategic and political instability in the area.
The second option is that Tehran had worse intentions regarding its nuclear program. In this case, you could put Hezbollah in Lebanon or Hamas in Gaza under its nuclear umbrella. And put Israel in an impossible position, handcuffed in their defense, with terrorist groups to operate freely and enjoying the Iranian nuclear umbrella. The strengthening of these Islamist groups would be a fact, to be followed by strengthening of other Islamic groups in the area.
The third scenario is even more dangerous to Western countries, and involves the possibility of nuclear components to Iran provide Islamic terrorism. You could use the atomic bomb without having to give up for it. There is the real possibility of an atomic holocaust in Europe or America, or even to vaporize Israel with a nuclear, paralyzing step possible European response.
combinations between the three scenarios are manifold. The possibility of a military response is real, although the problem is the political management, especially with the internal situation and the election calendar of the countries involved. Unfortunately, the chances of the international community are closing as time passes. Every time when it counts more on the how.
Source: Digital Freedom
Occidental 
0 comments:
Post a Comment