causes for alleged "slave labor and subjection to servitude" in rural ranch north of Buenos Aires, which instructs the Federal Court No. 2 of San Nicolas, accumulated in two cases and the prosecution "the crime of trafficking in persons is proven," judicial sources said.
"From the standpoint of Public Prosecutions is proven the crime of trafficking, and in some cases have called for detention and questioning of the managers of the companies involved," said spokesmen Telam research.
However, the sources said, Judge Carlos Villafuerte Ruzo rejected the measures promoted by the prosecution and rejected calls for elimination of any prison presented by the defendants.
So far "no There is no detention, "reported close to the records.
causes originated after raids in two areas of the locality of San Pedro on 30 December and on January 4 last, and three other farms that exploit Status firms Suthern Ager SA and Seeds Production in the cities of Ramallo and reefs, where they found about 274 people in deplorable and inhumane working conditions.
The five cases in which we investigate the alleged crime of trafficking in persons, the cumulative in two cases according to the companies operating the fields and not by the establishments raided, judicial sources stated.
Federal Judge No. 1 of San Nicolas, Martin Alberto Martinez, who subrogated to Ruzo Villafuerte for his license, said Telam that extended the gag in both cases until Jan. 25, as adopted by the owner of Court No. 2 before you take your vacation.
The judge explained that the statements incorporated in the files are "taken by the police" the exploited workers santiagueños when the raids were legal.
Judge Ruzo Villafuerte did not delegate the investigation of cases in the prosecution, so that the Attorney General can only request measures which are at the discretion of the federal court No. 2.
According to judicial sources, the judge denied the prosecution's request to stop and take a statement from the directors of the companies involved in alleged cases of human trafficking and bonded laborers.
The same sources reported that the judge "also denied immunity from imprisonment filed by the accused, which is contradictory, because if it sees no reason to call them to testify there is no reason to reject the elimination of any prison."
http://www.telam.com.ar/vernota.php?tipo=N&idPub=209664&id=397977&dis=1&sec=1
0 comments:
Post a Comment